Agenda and draft minutes

Health and Wellbeing Board - Monday, 9th March, 2026 2.00 pm

Venue: HMS Phoebe, BCP Civic Centre, Bournemouth BH2 6DY. View directions

Contact: Louise Smith, Email: louise.smith@bcpcouncil.gov.uk  Email: democratic.services@bcpcouncil.gov.uk

Media

Items
No. Item

39.

Apologies

To receive any apologies for absence from Councillors.

Minutes:

Apologies for absence were received from Matthew Byrant, Peter Browning, Betty Butlin, Aidan Dunn, Karen Loftus and Dawn Dawson.

40.

Substitute Members

To receive information on any changes in the membership of the Committee.

 

Note – When a member of a Committee is unable to attend a meeting of a Committee or Sub-Committee, the relevant Political Group Leader (or their nominated representative) may, by notice to the Monitoring Officer (or their nominated representative) prior to the meeting, appoint a substitute member from within the same Political Group. The contact details on the front of this agenda should be used for notifications.

 

Minutes:

Ellie Lindop substituted for Dawn Dawson and Kate Parker substituted Karen Loftus on this occasion.

41.

Confirmation of Minutes pdf icon PDF 279 KB

To confirm and sign as a correct record the minutes of the Meeting held on 12 January 2026.

Minutes:

The Minutes of the Board held on 12 January 2026 were confirmed as an accurate record and signed by the Chair.

42.

Declarations of Interests

Councillors are requested to declare any interests on items included in this agenda. Please refer to the workflow on the preceding page for guidance.

Declarations received will be reported at the meeting.

Minutes:

There were no declarations of interest on this occasion.

43.

Public Issues

To receive any public questions, statements or petitions submitted in accordance with the Constitution. Further information on the requirements for submitting these is available to view at the following link:-

https://democracy.bcpcouncil.gov.uk/documents/s2305/Public%20Items%20-%20Meeting%20Procedure%20Rules.pdf 

The deadline for the submission of public questions is 12.00 noon, Tuesday 3 March 2026.

The deadline for the submission of a statement is 12.00 noon, Friday 6 March 2026.

The deadline for the submission of a petition is Friday 20 February 2026.

Minutes:

There were no public issues on this occasion.

44.

NHS Dorset ICB 5 Year Commissioning Plan pdf icon PDF 328 KB

NHS England’s new planning framework published on 24 October 2025, marked a shift from short-term operational cycles to a longer-term, locally led approach to improvement, aligned to the ambitions of the 10-Year Health Plan. It introduces a multi-year funding settlement, a revised operating model, and a focus on local innovation, prevention, digital transformation, and quality of care. 

Integrated Care Boards were required to develop a Five-Year Commissioning plan setting out how local services will be transformed through strategic priorities, improving population health, reducing inequalities, and ensuring long-term financial sustainability. NHS Dorset ICB 5-year plan was submitted to NHS England on 12 February 2026 as per national requirements.

An initial high level overview of Dorset Integrated Care Boards (ICB) Five Year Commissioning Plan was presented to Health and Wellbeing Board members on 12 January 2026.

Feedback received from members was incorporated within the submitted plan. The commissioning plan remains iterative in nature and will evolve to incorporate more specific place-based priorities aligned to the local neighbourhood health plans once they are developed.

Additional documents:

Minutes:

The Deputy Director of Performance and Planning, NHS Dorset, presented a report, a copy of which had been circulated to each Member and a copy of which appears as Appendix 'A' to these Minutes in the Minute Book.

 

NHS England’s new planning framework published on 24 October 2025, marked a shift from short-term operational cycles to a longer-term, locally led approach to improvement, aligned to the ambitions of the 10-Year Health Plan. It introduced a multi-year funding settlement, a revised operating model, and a focus on local innovation, prevention, digital transformation, and quality of care. 

 

Integrated Care Boards were required to develop a Five-Year Commissioning plan setting out how local services would be transformed through strategic priorities, improving population health, reducing inequalities, and ensuring long-term financial sustainability. NHS Dorset ICB 5-year plan was submitted to NHS England on 12 February 2026 as per national requirements.

 

An initial high level overview of Dorset Integrated Care Boards (ICB) Five Year Commissioning Plan was presented to Health and Wellbeing Board members on 12 January 2026.

 

Feedback received from members was incorporated within the submitted plan. The commissioning plan remains iterative in nature and would evolve to incorporate more specific place-based priorities aligned to the local neighbourhood health plans once they were developed.

 

The Board discussed the report, including:

 

  • A Board Member thanked colleagues from the ICB for taking comments on board and welcome an evidence based approach.
  • Neighbourhood health was highlighted as a really positive step to shift from hospital to community and prevention from disease.
  • Members welcomed the updated strategic commissioning intentions and noted that earlier feedback had been incorporated.
  • It was emphasised that the work would be iterative, with ongoing alignment across commissioning activities and health partners, particularly in relation to neighbourhood plans.
  • A Board Member praised the achievement of developing a coherent strategy despite wider system pressures.
  • Enthusiasm was expressed for progressing neighbourhood health across Dorset and the BCP area, supporting a shift from hospital-based care toward prevention and community-focused models.
  • The plan’s clear focus on prevention, reducing inequalities, wider determinants of health, and co-designing services with people and communities was noted.
  • The Board was advised of positive cross-organisational discussions in recent weeks regarding governance and future ICB cluster arrangements.
  • It was acknowledged that there would be challenges during ICB cluster changes but constructive engagement to maintain delivery focus was welcomed.

 

RESOLVED that the Health and Wellbeing Board:

  • Note the final ICB Five Year Commissioning Plan; and
  • Endorse the ICB Five Year Commissioning Plan.

 

Voting: Nem. Con.

 

The Chair, with consensus, moved Agenda Item 8 - Developing a Place Based Partnership for BCP to be the next item considered by the Board.

 

45.

Developing a Place Based Partnership for BCP pdf icon PDF 170 KB

 

 

 

This paper sets out the background, rationale, purpose, and scope for developing a Place-Based Partnership (PBP) in Bournemouth, Christchurch & Poole (BCP), drawing on local and national context.

Ultimately the paper aims to support the BCP Health & Wellbeing Board in considering the establishment and operation of a BCP Placed Based Partnership, clarifying its distinct role, governance, and relationship to existing structures.

Minutes:

The Corporate Director for Wellbeing presented a report, a copy of which had been circulated to each Member and a copy of which appears as Appendix 'C' to these Minutes in the Minute Book.

 

The report set out the background, rationale, purpose, and scope for developing a Place-Based Partnership (PBP) in Bournemouth, Christchurch & Poole (BCP), drawing on local and national context.

Ultimately the paper aimed to support the BCP Health & Wellbeing Board (HWBB) in considering the establishment and operation of a BCP Placed Based Partnership, clarifying its distinct role, governance, and relationship to existing structures.

 

In summary:

 

  • Consensus to date had been that the PBP should act as a non-statutory strategic delivery group for the Health & Wellbeing Board which was a statutory and formal committee
  • This would allow for greater agility and flexibility to determine local form and function and respond to local priorities and needs
  • The HWBB would continue as a statutory committee and would formally provide strategic direction and oversight to the PBP. Strategic oversight could also be provided by the ICB Cluster Board as necessary to ensure join up and direction of NHS resources at place 
  • The PBP would act as an officer-led executive delivery group (similar to the previous ICS System Executive Group) for both the HWBB and the ICB Cluster Board, providing a collaborative space for senior executives to meet to plan, arrange and co-ordinate the delivery of key strategies and programmes that seek to transform and integrate services to improve the health & wellbeing of BCP residents.
  • The partnership was where the work would be done to join together programmes and have honest and challenging conversations in a safe and respectful space.
  • Initial programmes in scope include:
  • BCP Health & Wellbeing Strategy
  • BCP Neighbourhood Health Plan & Neighbourhood Health Programme and prevention
  • Future Care Programme
  • Better Care Fund and joint commissioning as appropriate
  • Strategic commissioning intentions
  • Place based engagement
  • Focus on facts & data, insights (linked to BCP Continuous improvement programme)
  • Building local knowledge
  • Opportunities around asset review to deliver shared aims of partnership at place and neighbourhoods.
  • The programmes in scope could be evolved and expanded over time to include other place-based programmes.
  • The partnership could share and redistribute financial resources, on approval of the HWBB and the ICB Cluster Board, and act as forum for joint commissioning
  • It was hoped that existing commissioning responsibilities could be delegated by the ICB to the PBP over time.

 

The Board discussed the report, including:

 

·       Members discussed the place-based partnership plans and noted that previous challenges and opportunities had been outlined.

·       The opportunity created by ICB clustering and wider partnership working across health, social care, and the voluntary sector was highlighted.

·       It was stressed that neighbourhood health should not be interpreted as narrowly as traditional health services, but as a partnership vehicle to drive local plans.

·       The Board was advised of increased clarity around system governance, with the partnership reporting to both the Health and Wellbeing Board and the ICB cluster board.

·       The need to avoid duplicating governance structures and  ...  view the full minutes text for item 45.

46.

BCP Community Safety Partnership Annual Report pdf icon PDF 691 KB

To note the BCP Community Safety Annual Report which was presented to Overview and Scrutiny Board on 23 February 2026.

 

This paper sets out elements of development and delivery by ‘Safer BCP’, the BCP Community Safety Partnership (CSP), and its constituent agencies.

Minutes:

The Head of Communities, Safety and Partnerships presented a report, a copy of which had been circulated to each Member and a copy of which appears as Appendix 'B' to these Minutes in the Minute Book.

 

The purpose of the Report was to note the BCP Community Safety Annual Report which was presented to Overview and Scrutiny Board on 23 February 2026.

 

The paper set out elements of development and delivery by ‘Safer BCP’, the BCP Community Safety Partnership (CSP), and its constituent agencies. It provided Members with an update since the last report to Overview and Scrutiny Board in January 2025.

 

The Local Government Act 2000 included crime and disorder scrutiny as one of the functions the council must ensure its scrutiny arrangements cover. Sections 19 and 20 of the Crime and Disorder Act 1998 and related regulations required the Council to have a committee with the functions of reviewing and scrutinising decisions and actions in respect of the discharge of crime and disorder functions by “responsible authorities”.

 

The specifics of the duty were set out in the Police and Justice Act 2006, which also allowed members to refer any “local crime and disorder matter” raised with them by anyone living or working in their area, to the Crime and Disorder Committee. The Board designated as the Crime and Disorder Scrutiny Committee must meet at least once every 12-month period to conduct the functions.

 

Guidance issued concerning how this role should be conducted include that:

 

• the role should be one of a critical friend, providing constructive challenge at a strategic level.

• the focus should be on the entire partnership and if issues arise that related specifically to a particular partner agency, it may be more appropriate to refer such issues to the governing bodies of that organisation.

• the scrutiny of partners should be “in so far as their activities relate to the partnership itself.”

 

In the BCP area, the Overview and Scrutiny Board undertake this function each year.

 

The Board discussed the report, including:

 

·       The Chair thanked officers for the comprehensive update on the Community Safety Partnership.

·       It was noted that the Community Safety Partnership team had received an award for its work.

·       The Board recognised downward trends in antisocial behaviour but acknowledged challenges around reporting and public perception.

·       The Board discussed cuckooing trends, noting unexpected age groups affected and wider safeguarding concerns.

·       The Board was advised that domestic abuse funding remained at previous levels, amounting to a real-term reduction.

·       It was noted that serious violence funding was being redirected nationally toward knife crime, which did not align with local priorities such as violence against women and girls.

·       Raised concern that current funding streams did not support key local initiatives including night-time economy safety work and the 'Just Don’t' campaign.

·       A Board Member suggested including case studies in future reports to better demonstrate real-life impact.

·       The Chair highlighted that fear of crime remained significantly higher than actual crime levels, impacting quality of life for some residents.  ...  view the full minutes text for item 46.

47.

Better Care Fund 2025-26 Quarter 3 Report pdf icon PDF 252 KB

This report provides an overview of the Quarter 3 Report of the Better Care Fund (BCF) for 2025-26.

The BCF is a key delivery vehicle in providing person-centred integrated care with health, social care, housing, and other public services, which is fundamental to maintaining a strong and sustainable health and care system.

The report is a part of the requirements set by the Better Care Fund 2025-26 Policy Framework. The report must be jointly agreed and signed off by the Health and Wellbeing Board as one of the planning requirements.

 

Minutes:

The Commissioning Manager and Senior Lead – Operations, NHS Dorset, presented a report, a copy of which had been circulated to each Member and a copy of which appears as Appendix 'D' to these Minutes in the Minute Book.

 

The report provided an overview of the Quarter 3 Report of the Better Care Fund (BCF) for 2025-26.

 

The BCF was a key delivery vehicle in providing person-centred integrated care with health, social care, housing, and other public services, which was fundamental to maintaining a strong and sustainable health and care system.

 

The report was a part of the requirements set by the Better Care Fund 2025-26 Policy Framework. The report must be jointly agreed and signed off by the Health and Wellbeing Board as one of the planning requirements.

 

The Board discussed the report, including:

 

·       Concerns were raised that, despite metrics showing activity ‘on track’, system pressures remained high, particularly around non-criteria-to-reside and people being in the wrong place in the system.

·       A reset conversation was suggested to increase impact and ensure people were placed appropriately within the system.

·       Discharge delays were acknowledged as not on track; enhanced caseload management, escalation pathways, and commissioning actions were highlighted as mitigation.

·       Questions were raised regarding future local authority funding, including the freeze to the local authority element and possible absorption into the Revenue Support Grant.

·       Concerns were raised about potential pressure on the Better Care Grant element if funding were absorbed into a broader formula and it was noted that the Council was waiting for clarification from government on future funding arrangements.

 

RESOLVED that the Health and Wellbeing Board retrospectively approve the Better Care Fund 2025-2026 Quarter 3 Report

 

Voting: Nem. Con.

48.

CQC Assurance Visit Outcome

To receive a verbal update of the CQC Assurance Visit Outcome.

Minutes:

The Corporate Director for Wellbeing advised that the Council had not yet heard from the Care Quality Commission with feed back from the assurance visit and therefore no update could be provided at this time.

49.

Work Plan pdf icon PDF 230 KB

For the Board to consider the Work Plan.

Minutes:

The Chair highlighted the items due to come to the next meeting and it was noted to add the CQC Assurance outcome, Health and Wellbeing strategy and Neighbourhood Health plans to the Work Plan.

 

Access to food partnership report and support required moving forward was highlighted as a potential topic for inclusion.

 

The Board noted its Work Plan.