This briefing is to help Committee inform its future work programme. Especially how health and care services respond to reducing inequalities in health.
Health inequalities are avoidable and unjust differences in health between groups of people. They are unjust because they don’t happen by chance. This means we can change them. There may be specific causes, such as lack of access to services, or timely diagnosis of disease. Or wider social factors such as income, education, housing or environmental factors.
BCP council has a statutory duty to assess and respond to health inequalities. So do our NHS organisations and partners in the integrated care system.
This paper gives an overview of what we know about health inequalities in BCP Council. It considers different approaches to how to reduce them. It takes stock of local progress, and it highlights areas that Committee may wish to review in the future.
Minutes:
The Director of Public Health presented a report, a copy of which had been circulated to each Member and a copy of which appears as Appendix 'C' to these Minutes in the Minute Book.
The purpose of the report was to enable Members to understand the main inequalities arising in health and social care and to be able to ask strategic questions of ICS partners to assess progress in reducing them.
The briefing was to help Committee inform its future work programme, especially how health and care services respond to reducing inequalities in health.
Health inequalities were avoidable and unjust differences in health between groups of people. They were unjust because they don’t happen by chance. This meant we can change them. There may be specific causes, such as lack of access to services, or timely diagnosis of disease. Or wider social factors such as income, education, housing or environmental factors.
BCP council had a statutory duty to assess and respond to health inequalities. So do our NHS organisations and partners in the integrated care system.
The paper gave an overview of what was known about health inequalities in BCP Council. It considered different approaches to how to reduce them. It took stock of local progress, and it highlighted areas that Committee may wish to review in the future.
The Committee discussed the report and comments were made, including:
· In response to queries regarding the report, the Director of Public Health advised the Committee to be careful not to make assumptions about associations between poor health outcomes and geographical location. In some cases geographic areas where housing was cheaper would be more likely to have people living there with conditions that would make it less likely for them to be able to work – hence the association with poorer health. In response to a query, the Director clarified that this was not in attempt to oversimplify, but was helpful when considering what contributes to areas with higher deprivation scores.
· In response to a comment regarding free will and vaccinations, the Committee was advised of the importance to understand why some people chose to not take up vaccinations offered and the possible reasons for that were highlighted.
The Chair concluded by advising of the need for the Committee to consider the Council’s Vision, delivery plans and the Health and Wellbeing Boards Strategy and consider the timeliness of any scrutiny of those to ensure the Committee can add value.
RECOMMENDED that the Committee:
(a) comment on the content of this briefing.
(b) To note the local work developing in response to health inequalities.
(c) To consider what areas or opportunities for scrutiny Committee includes in its forward plan around progress in tackling inequalities in health.
Supporting documents: