The Corporate Director for Wellbeing presented
a report, a copy of which had been circulated to each Member and a
copy of which appears as Appendix ‘A’ to these Minutes
in the Minute Book.
The Committee had been offered
a briefing on the Council’s public health responsibilities to
inform their findings. It was hoped that the Committee’s
discussion would inform design work.
The Committee considered the
questions posed to them as set out at Paragraph 8 of the report and
made comments, including:
- In
response to a query, the Director of Public Health (DPH), Public
Health Dorset advised that his current role as a shared DPH has
been as a strategic lead for the system.
- The
Committee considered the models of practice set out in Annexe A to
the report and a member highlighted the need to engage effectively
with hard to reach communities and the positive impact that could
have on the whole system.
- The
Committee when considering the community advocate role detailed was
advised of the importance to ensure there was a clear distinction
between the role of DPH as an Officer and elected members of the
Council.
- The
Vice Chair highlighted the role of the provider detailed and felt
that would be the best fit for an internal DPH.
- There was further discussion over the role of the DPH and it was
felt that the role should be focussed and provide an intelligence
led DPH service which could offer advice and support to services
such as libraries and communities.
- The
Committees considered the functions of the DPH and how it was
important to ensure that objectives were evidence led, scalable and
had political support and acceptance.
- In
response to a query regarding the positive actions which could be
gained from having a DPH serving BCP solely, the DPH advised he
would focus on increasing physical activity across the conurbation
by promoting it in daily activities.
- In
response to a query, it was confirmed that the DPH was a statutory
role to deliver the mandatory services required by the Department
for Health and Social Care.
The Chair proposed the
following to the Committee for consideration:
This committee agrees to
indicate to the Director of Wellbeing that the role of Director of
Public Health Should be primarily one as a provider to enable
budgetary management, whilst at the same time being able to offer
independent expert advice to Officers and the Council.
This committee is open to the
role, incorporating other services or functions, providing those
are not too broad and to ensure that this is led by public health
intelligence. The committee agrees that there are a number of areas
where influence could be of benefit and that these should continue
to be explored.
The Committee discussed the
recommendation and the following comments were made:
- A
Committee Member expressed a wish for the areas of influence to be
detailed in the recommendation and include knife crime, active
travel and drug addiction.
- There was some discussion about whether it was appropriate to
include the prevention of knife crime within the remit of the DPH
and it was advised that this could be done by using the PH
intelligence functions carefully and collaboratively working with
other interventions and organisations.
- The
Vice Chair highlighted how it would be beneficial if Committee
reports had a section which detailed the impact on health
included.
- A
Committee Member expressed the wish for early intervention to be
included in the areas of influence as it was felt that this could
encompass some of the issues discussed.
It was Proposed,
Seconded and RESOLVED that:
- This
committee agrees to indicate to the Corporate Director of Wellbeing
that:
a)
the role of Director of Public Health Should be
primarily one as a provider to enable budgetary management, whilst
at the same time being able to offer independent expert advice to
Officers and the Council.
b)
This committee is open to the role, incorporating
other services or functions, providing those are not too broad and
to ensure that this is led by public health intelligence. The
committee agrees that there are a number of areas where influence
could be of benefit and that these should continue to be explored.
The Committee discussed areas where influence could be used and
gave the following examples: active travel, knife crime, drug
addiction, early intervention.
- Committee members agree that a
further report will be provided to the meeting in
July.
-