The Assistant Chief Financial Officer (CFO)
presented a report, a copy of which had been circulated to each
Member and a copy of which appears as Appendix 'D' to these Minutes
in the Minute Book.
In July 2023 the Committee agreed to reduce
the Council’s debt threshold. It also agreed to strengthen
the governance arrangements around any proposal to increase the
debt threshold in future by requiring the Committee to consider the
robustness of the ability of any significant new business case to
service its debt obligations. In line with this decision the
Committee was now asked to consider the business case to increase
approved prudential borrowing to fund the Poole Museum project by
£1.3 million. This was in relation to Cabinet and Council
decisions in July 2025. The detailed financial forecast provided as
part of the Cabinet report was included in the report to the
Committee for reference.
The Assistant CFO, the Interim Museum Director
and the Project Manager responded to questions on the report:
- On the level of
confidence that borrowing repayments could be accommodated in the
short term before income was realised, it was explained that
repayments had been staggered and would increase over time. The
project was considered to be affordable in the short and longer
term. The business case had been conservative in estimating income
and had overestimated in terms of costs and there was confidence
that the visitor forecast and revenue potential would support the
borrowing repayments. It was noted that the first week of partial
reopening had been very successful.
- On how the increase
in borrowing compared to the wider picture, it was confirmed that
the increase was fairly insignificant within the Council’s
overall debt and repayments.
- On the variances in
fundraising, it was explained why the third party funding had been
required to cover a new scope, but it was noted that this had still
been beneficial in contributing to the original scope and business
plan. The business plan had always included an assumption that
borrowing may be needed to mitigate the risk of funding not being
secured. It was noted that funding had been double counted in one
instance due to clerical error.
- On whether the
additional borrowing affected the external grants, Members were
assured that there were no associated risks with partnership
funding.
- On reasons for
variances in expenditure, it was confirmed that this did include an
increase in construction related costs, due to a number of factors
affecting the industry resulting in significant prolongation.
- On business rates,
a Member gave an example of where these had been successfully
challenged elsewhere. It was noted that a potential rebate was
under consideration, however Members were advised that this was a
complex area.
- On the Museum
project’s longer term sustainability, it was explained that
National Lottery funding was supporting work to review the
museum’s operating model and ten year plan and to develop a
resilience strategy to ensure its long-term sustainability as a
cultural asset for the community.
Voting: Unanimous