The
Cllr Olivia Brown presented a report, a copy of which had been circulated to
each Member and a copy of which appears as Appendix 'C’ to these Minutes in the
Minute Book.
The
Children’s Services Overview and Scrutiny Committee commissioned a Family Hubs
Working Group to better understand and review progress of the implementation of
Family Hubs in BCP.
The
purpose of this report was to inform the committee of the output of the working
group, including suggested recommendations.
The
Committee discussed the report, including:
- The Committee was advised of an error in the
report, which stated that the visit had taken place at the Kinson Hub,
when the Working Group had in fact visited the Poole Town and West Howe
Hubs.
- In response to a query raised regarding staff
engagement, the Committee was advised that staff had welcomed the
opportunity to speak openly with Members, and that the visits had provided
valuable insight into frontline practice.
- Members of the working group advised of the
strength of community engagement, and the Committee was informed that this
continued to be a notable feature of the hubs’ work, with teams actively
building relationships with families and local organisations.
- In response to a query regarding staff support
and retention, the Committee was advised that staff feedback had been
positive overall, and that ongoing professional development, wellbeing
arrangements and reflective practice remained priorities.
- In response to a query raised regarding
performance and impact measures, and the Committee was advised that work
was underway to further develop clear KPIs relating to inclusivity,
accessibility and engagement, supplemented by improved data and feedback mechanisms.
- In response to a query raised regarding future
oversight, the Committee was advised that the Best Start in Life programme
would provide the framework for further development, with the first hub
identified at Boscombe, and it was agreed that an update on the programme
would be brought to the Committee at the June meeting following
publication of the Local Plan in March. ADD TO WORK PLAN
- The Committee agreed in the value of maintaining
dialogue, and that informal engagement, including rapporteur arrangements,
would support continuous visibility and strengthen Member-officer
relationships going forward.
RESOLVED
that the Committee noted the report and agreed the following recommendations
arising from the Family Hubs Working Group.
The
Committee agreed the Working Group’s recommendations to Officers:
- Continue to build on the
strong foundations of community engagement, with a focus on inclusivity
and responsiveness.
- Explore ways to support
staff wellbeing that are informed by staff experiences and feedback.
- Develop clear measures
of effectiveness relating to Family Hubs, with key performance indicators
focused on reach, inclusivity and responsiveness to evolving community
needs, supported by improved data collection and feedback.
Note:
These recommendations are directed to the Head of Service, Early Help and
Targeted Intervention, and the Director of Children’s Social Care.
The
Committee agreed to make Cabinet aware that the Working Group recommended
Cabinet:
- Notes the scrutiny that
has been undertaken on Family Hubs and the Working Group’s finding of the
strong staff commitment to community engagement.
- Endorses continued
support for Family Hubs, with future priorities to include investment in
staff capacity, professional development and enhanced tools to evidence
impact.
The
Committee agreed the Working Group’s recommendation that the Children’s
Services Overview & Scrutiny Committee:
- Establishes regular,
informal dialogue between the Committee and Family Hub teams to maintain
transparency and shared understanding. This to be undertaken annually by
named rapporteurs and included on the Committee’s work programme. Agreed
rapporteurs to maintain links to Family Hubs through independent visits
and highlight any significant progress or red flags to the Committee as
they arise, to assist Members in identifying where further scrutiny may be
valuable.
Voting: Nem. Con.