The Cllr Olivia Brown presented a report, a copy of
which had been circulated to each Member and a copy of which
appears as Appendix 'C’ to these Minutes in the Minute
Book.
The Children’s Services Overview and Scrutiny
Committee commissioned a Family Hubs Working Group to better
understand and review progress of the implementation of Family Hubs
in BCP.
The purpose of this report was to inform the
committee of the output of the working group, including suggested
recommendations.
The Committee discussed the report,
including:
- The Committee
was advised of an error in the report, which stated that the visit
had taken place at the Kinson Hub, when the Working Group had in
fact visited the Poole Town and West Howe Hubs.
- In response to
a query raised regarding staff engagement, the Committee was
advised that staff had welcomed the opportunity to speak openly
with Members, and that the visits had provided valuable insight
into frontline practice.
- Members of the
working group advised of the strength of community engagement, and
the Committee was informed that this continued to be a notable
feature of the hubs’ work, with teams actively building
relationships with families and local organisations.
- In response to
a query regarding staff support and retention, the Committee was
advised that staff feedback had been positive overall, and that
ongoing professional development, wellbeing arrangements and
reflective practice remained priorities.
- In response to
a query raised regarding performance and impact measures, and the
Committee was advised that work was underway to further develop
clear KPIs relating to inclusivity, accessibility and engagement,
supplemented by improved data and feedback mechanisms.
- In response to
a query raised regarding future oversight, the Committee was
advised that the Best Start in Life programme would provide the
framework for further development, with the first hub identified at
Boscombe, and it was agreed that an update on the programme would
be brought to the Committee at the June meeting following
publication of the Local Plan in March. ADD TO WORK
PLAN
- The Committee
agreed in the value of maintaining dialogue, and that informal
engagement, including rapporteur arrangements, would support
continuous visibility and strengthen Member-officer relationships
going forward.
RESOLVED that the Committee noted the report and
agreed the following recommendations arising from the Family Hubs
Working Group.
The Committee agreed the Working Group’s
recommendations to Officers:
- Continue to
build on the strong foundations of community engagement, with a
focus on inclusivity and responsiveness.
- Explore
ways to support staff wellbeing that are informed by staff
experiences and feedback.
- Develop
clear measures of effectiveness relating to Family Hubs, with key
performance indicators focused on reach, inclusivity and
responsiveness to evolving community needs, supported by improved
data collection and feedback.
Note: These recommendations are directed
to the Head of Service, Early Help and Targeted Intervention, and
the Director of Children’s Social Care.
The Committee agreed to make Cabinet aware that the
Working Group recommended Cabinet:
- Notes the
scrutiny that has been undertaken on Family Hubs and the Working
Group’s finding of the strong staff commitment to community
engagement.
- Endorses
continued support for Family Hubs, with future priorities to
include investment in staff capacity, professional development and
enhanced tools to evidence impact.
The Committee agreed the Working Group’s
recommendation that the Children’s Services Overview &
Scrutiny Committee:
- Establishes
regular, informal dialogue between the Committee and Family Hub
teams to maintain transparency and shared understanding. This to be
undertaken annually by named rapporteurs and included on the
Committee’s work programme. Agreed rapporteurs to maintain
links to Family Hubs through independent visits and highlight any
significant progress or red flags to the Committee as they arise,
to assist Members in identifying where further scrutiny may be
valuable.
Voting: Nem.
Con.