The Leader of the Council presented a report, a copy of
which had been circulated to each Member and a copy of which appears as
Appendix 'B' to these Minutes in the Minute Book. A number of issues were
raised by the Board in the subsequent discussion, including:
- A Board member queried the results of the consultation,
specifically the removal of clauses b-e, and stated that the proposals
seemed to contradict some of the results of the responses received. She
added that she felt it had been an odd time to undertake such a
consultation and could not understand the rationale behind removing the
clauses before further consulting on a conurbation-wide PSPO because it
was not clear from the consultation that had already happened in relation
to the Holes Bay and Poole Town Centre PSPO, what people really thought
about it. She therefore proposed that the clauses that were due to be
removed be retained for the consultation across the conurbation, which was
duly seconded.
In discussing the proposed amendment there were a variety of
opinions and a number of issues were raised by Board Members, including:
- There was a mandate for the consultation to go ahead as
planned, as the figures were balanced. Additionally, it would be
counter-productive to issue fines to those already in poverty and the
removal of clauses b-e was appropriate.
- The PSPO in its current form was prejudicial to those in
need and could put the Council at risk of challenge via Judicial Review.
- There was an evidence base to support the use of PSPO’s
and that the current one had been successful in its operation as it’s
purpose was to prevent issues and the proof was that since its
introduction only three fixed penalty notices had been issued.
- A member had conducted a walk around Bournemouth Town
Centre after lockdown measures had been eased and made a note of his
observations. He added that while he did have sympathy with those less
fortunate, there was clearly an issue with the town centre and the
measures currently weren’t working stating that residents, visitors and
businesses were becoming fed up with these issues and he would therefore
support the amendment as proposed.
- Dealing with issues in a heavy-handed way was not always
the best approach and more sympathy should be shown as everyone was
generally within a few pay checks away from poverty.
- Intervention was the best solution rather than enforcement
and this would involve working more closely with external agencies.
The Board took a vote on the motion and it was:
RECOMMENDED that no changes should be made to the existing Poole Town Centre and Holes
Bay PSPO and that its existing clauses (a-g) be included as part of the BCP
wide Public Spaces Protection Order consultation.
Voting: For – 7 Against – 6
Cllrs G Farquhar and C Rigby requested that their votes
against the motion be recorded in the minutes.
Cllrs M Greene and N Greene did not vote due to their
declared interest.